Tvindy

My Photo

Archives

  • January 2009
  • November 2008
  • March 2008
  • November 2007
  • June 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • December 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006

Photo Albums

  • Walrus Skull
    Aquarium
  • P3160013
    Eugene Webloggers Meetup
  • Tiny Tvindy
    Old Pics
  • Birdies 2
    Pic of the Week
  • Tom Cherry Mufflers
    The Neon Lights of Muncie, Indiana
Subscribe to this blog's feed
Add me to your TypePad People list

Ancient TV Pics

Recently I got a bunch of old negatives scanned at ScanCafe.They were pictures that I had taken on a very inexpensive camera when I was between six and eight. Today I'll share with you my adventures in photographing the TV.

The image below shows our first color television. If you look closely at the screen, you'll see that the program being aired is The Munsters, with Lilly and Herman in bed.

I have a vague memory of my mother telling me that it wouldn't turn out, because of the reflection from the flash. I decided to try again without the flash, my logic being that one of the two pictures would probably be acceptable. This is the result with no flash:

Clearly the first photo is the winner, although you can still clearly see the contents of the screen in the second, which is the end credits to the Munsters. It is truly astonishing to me how blind that camera was without a flash for indoor photography.

This final photo (of another TV set in the house) was a decades-long mystery to me. The original print was not clear enough or large enough for me to ever be able to determine what was on the screen. It looked like some sort of odd tropical fish. Once I saw the 21st-century scan of it, I very quickly recognized it for what it was. Can you identify the program?

November 05, 2008 at 10:59 PM in My Old Works, Old Photos, Photography | Permalink | Comments (6)

And Now for Something Completely Different

Remember that praying mantis photo I posted back in 2003? Well, a Dutch blogger stumbled across it and and used the image as a template for a tattoo. How cool is that? As far as I know, I'm the very first blogger to have been so honored.

April 08, 2006 at 06:59 PM in Blogging, Photography | Permalink | Comments (7) | TrackBack (0)

Pounds and Pictures

I fear that I'm not going to be a very good blogger this summer. Since I left my computer in Oregon, I do all my blogging on my mother's computer, meaning that I have to go to my parents' house to use the internet. The lack of convenience seems to be slowing down my writing a bit and causing me to get behind on my daily blog reading, but I'll try to improve my posting frequency.

My weight loss has slowed down, but the pounds are still coming off. As of today I've lost 15 pounds since returning to Muncie. (I just have 17 more pounds to go to reach my ideal weight.) As a result, my back is feeling quite a bit better, and my running times are improving. I'm hoping to get in shape to eventually run another marathon, but, this early on, it's too early to know for sure. That was my plan last summer, and all it got me was a bad knee injury. Hopefully my weight loss will prevent that from happening again. Anyway, if I do run a marathon, it will be this one.

In other news, I've submitted two of my photos (this one and this one) for an exhibition in a local art gallery. They're hanging there right now, and I've heard rumors that they are fairly popular, especially the bird one. It will be interesting to see if anyone actually buys one.

July 08, 2005 at 07:02 AM in Photography | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Make a Life Poster

Lifeposter

This entry was inspired by Mike Matas' life poster idea (that I learned of through Bill). Mike's idea is pure genius, but he uses a mac and iPhoto, so his options are very different from those available to us PC users. I became very frustrated after trying to duplicate his results on my PC and finally went about it in a different way. The above image is the poster I made from photos taken by me over the past year at the Yamada Language Center here at the U of O. The jpeg looks like crap, because I had to make it small and blurry to protect the identities of some of the people featured, a few of whom have made it clear they don't want their faces appearing on the internet. But the physical version is actually quite spectacular, and I'll be presenting it to Yamada when school starts up again.

If you're on a PC and want to make your own version of a life poster, just follow these instructions. You will need the following:

  • A PC with internet access
  • Picasa2, which you can download for free here.
  • A Shutterfly account -- free to set up
  • Image editing software (I use and recommend Adobe Photoshop Elements.)

Select exactly 64 of your best pictures. Try to include images taken in a variety of settings in various kinds of light. The more eye-catching and colorful the better.

Once you have your images, you will need to crop each one so that it is perfectly square. (To do this in Photoshop Elements, select the Rectangular Marquee Tool, set the style to "Fixed Aspect Ratio", and set both width and height to 1. Frame the area you wish to use. Then click on the "Image" drop-down menu, and select "Crop".)

After an image has been cropped, you may want to tweak it a little. Since there are 64 separate images, it is important that each one can stand on its own and not become overshadowed by the others. One way of accomplishing this is to increase the contrast and color saturation slightly more than you normally would for a full-sized image.

In Picasa go to the folder where the images are located, highlight them, and click the Collage button at the bottom of the screen. In the popup window, for "type" select "Picture Grid", choose a location to save to, and click the "Create" button. (If you don't like the layout of your images, just click on the preview pane for another randomly generated layout.)

Open the file created by Picasa in your image-editing program. You must now add space at the top for a header (which is necessary to conform to Shutterfly's available printing dimensions). The number of pixels depends on the physical dimensions you choose for the final product:

  • For an 8 by 10 poster, add 640 pixels.
  • For an 11 by 14 poster, add 699 pixels.
  • For a 16 by 20 poster, add 640 pixels.

(To add space to the top of an image in Photoshop Elements, click on "Image", go to "Resize", and click on "Canvas Size". In the popup window, set the "Height" units as "pixels", and replace the current number of pixels (2560) with the desired number (3200 or 3259). Set the Anchor point in the bottom middle square (one down from the center). Click OK.)

You can put whatever you like in the header. I chose text for mine. The easiest way to add text is to open your word processor, choose an appropriate font, and type it in as large a font size as possible. Then you just take a screenshot, paste it into your image-editing program, crop it, copy it, paste it into the header space, and resize it to fit. A more impressive option would be to add a panoramic image to the top. And, of course, if you don't mind wasting the extra space, you could simply add nothing and very carefully trim the whitespace off the poster when you receive it.

Once you've gotten everything laid out the way you want it, simply upload the image to your Shutterfly account and order a print at the desired dimensions. If you like, Shutterfly gives you the option to add a border to your image.

Feel free to leave a comment if you have additional tips or comments.

March 20, 2005 at 04:44 AM in Photography | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)

Create Your Own Stamps

Look what I just discovered! The US Postal Service is letting people design their own stamps. You can actually upload a photo, choose a denomination, and order a sheet of twenty. Make no mistake; these are not just another version of pretend stamps that look real but need to be accompanied by legitimate postage stamps if you actually expect the post office to deliver them. These puppies are valid postage. The downside is that they will cost you far more than regular stamps, and, when you factor in the cost of shipping (Yes, you actually pay postage on your postage.), you'll be paying as much as three times the normal rate.

Is it worth it. Well, for me, no. I never write letters, and all my bills get paid online. Six or seven years ago, I would have embraced the service, but now it's too late for me. For others, however, the service may turn out to be a godsend. I'm thinking specifically of Receptionista who has stated repeatedly that she loves getting and sending letters. Now she can put her author pic on a stamp and astonish her friends and relatives. She can have another set of stamps made with the Pinprick logo for sending packages to her customers.

And then there is Bakerina. She's been known to send out such baked goods as camouflaged lemon curd to selected fellow bloggers on more than one occasion. What could be better than receiving baked goods with this image on the stamp? And that's not just a rhetorical question. Bakerina has been promising for years to post pics of her boobies. Now she can do it on an official US postage stamp, which may be a better option for her, so the pics don't end up online. (Of course, that wouldn't prevent me from scanning the stamp and posting the image myself in order to respect the public's right to view.)

So far, Leo is the only person on my blogroll to design a stamp. (Actually, I heard about the service on his blog, not the other way around.) But I'm sure there will be many more. What's next? I'm hoping the US Mint will start letting us design our own money. Wouldn't that be fun? I know someone who would jump at the chance.

August 16, 2004 at 02:00 PM in Photography | Permalink | Comments (8) | TrackBack (0)

Kitty in Motion

I swear I didn't photoshop this picture. I just used a slow shutter speed on a rapidly self-licking kitty.

August 15, 2004 at 02:00 PM in New Photos, Photography | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)

Time for a New Camera

The camera I have now is a Fujifilm FinePix A303. I bought it from Amazon.com for $298 on December 9, 2002. Back then TechTV was running a special show counting down the top 20 technology gifts of 2002. My camera was listed at number seven. After a quick bit of research, I decided to buy it. It was a great purchase. I've taken more than 3500 pictures, and some of them are fantastic. Today you can get it on Amazon for $129, so it's still a great deal.

My original plan was to wait until December 2003 to purchase my next camera for about the same price. I figured that, by then, the technology would have improved substantially, and I could just buy whatever TechTV said was best. Unfortunately, their choice for low-end digital camera was not what I wanted. The list is no longer available, and I no longer remember the name of their choice, but all it had going for it was a two-inch viewscreen. I read a bunch of user reviews and articles to try to find a good camera, but there really wasn't anything available at the time that was clearly superior. So I waited.

In the past few weeks, I've started to become disenchanted with my camera. I'm not sure if it has deteriorated from overuse and wear and tear or if I am just becoming more aware of its limitations. Certainly it has had its share of falls, one of which was so severe that some of the corners were dented (as was my face). As a result, the retractable lensecap doesn't always retract without help. Lately I am often disappointed by the lack of vibrancy in the colors of my pictures and by the slight blurriness, which is often present. Indoor flash photography is also somewhat problematic.

Orionoir has done much to make me lose faith in my camera. Whenever he posts a photo, my first reaction is "wow, I wish my camera could take pictures like that!" I mean, look at this, and this, and fricken THIS. I've lived with my camera long enough to know intuitively that, under the same circumstances, it would not have captured the same images at anywhere near that level of quality. (Or it could be that Orionoir is simply a master photographer, and I am not.)

What ultimately pushed me over the edge and made me purchase a new camera was an incident last week. I was cleaning the lense with rubbing alcohol, and somehow some of the fluid got inside the camera behind the lense. All the camera could see was a big blur. About ten minutes later, it had evaporated, and the camera had its vision back, but who knows what subtle damage may have occurred.

PC Magazine recommends the Olympus Camedia C-5060 5.1 MP Digital Camera. It's a bit pricey, but it looks like exactly what I want. It even works with xD cards, so I don't have to buy new media. With this camera, I shall rule the world!

May 30, 2004 at 03:59 AM in Photography | Permalink | Comments (7) | TrackBack (0)

Seeds

This is just me playing around with my image editor. Someone brought some seeds to class, and I took a picture of them. I was playing around with the image. Since it ended up looking fairly interesting, I thought I would post it.

May 22, 2004 at 03:59 AM in Photography | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

The Solarize Effect

My favorite image editing effect is solarization. People don't use it very often, because for the vast majority of photos, it isn't very impressive. However, with the right image, the effect can be spectacular. It works best with backlit images, where the foreground image is too dark to be clear. Solarizing lightens up the darker parts of the image without giving them a washed out-look, and it takes the lighter elements and makes them into a color negative. You can read all about solarization here.

I've put together a page with some of my better solarized images. (For technical reasons I couldn't use the mouseover effect directly in the blog without monkeying with the template.) To see the effect, just mouse over the before images. To go there, click here.

April 06, 2004 at 03:59 AM in Photography | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)

More Coast Photos

I've added photos from this weekend's trip to the coast to the album. The last ten shots are from the more recent trip.

March 29, 2004 at 01:59 AM in New Photos, Photography, Travel | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)

Next »

Primary Readers

  • Mulubinba Moments
  • bill stevenson dot org
  • Snowball in Hell
  • Bakerina
  • Youngest of One
  • Following Edge
  • Reality Sandwich

Intermittent Readers

  • TwilightCafĂ©
  • Figs and Pomegranates
  • Centime
  • Music and Cats
  • Teka
  • Snozzle5
  • 'mouse

Good stuff

  • Jumping Monkeys
  • #!/usr/bin/girl
  • Amberbamberboo
  • Leo Laporte
  • Contrary Brin
  • Paul Graham

Recent Comments

  • girish on Cultural Jeopardy
  • Apeman on Are Humans Apes?
  • tvindy on Ancient TV Pics
  • hi on Ancient TV Pics
  • flowmaster mufflers on Ancient Comments
  • Amy on Are Humans Apes?
  • Amy on Are Humans Apes?
  • Switchblademan on Barbie Girl (foreign)
  • s on Are Humans Apes?
  • Thomas on Brazilian Soap Operas

Recently Updated Weblogs

  • Rebeccaboville's blog
  • Jonah Manning's blog
  • seruu's blog
  • seruu's blog
  • sports uncensored 24/7
  • seruu's blog
  • Elizabeth Riggin's blog
  • Spencer Lee
  • habashy's blog
  • Our Ordinary Days