Tvindy

My Photo

Archives

  • January 2009
  • November 2008
  • March 2008
  • November 2007
  • June 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • December 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006

Photo Albums

  • Walrus Skull
    Aquarium
  • P3160013
    Eugene Webloggers Meetup
  • Tiny Tvindy
    Old Pics
  • Birdies 2
    Pic of the Week
  • Tom Cherry Mufflers
    The Neon Lights of Muncie, Indiana
Subscribe to this blog's feed
Add me to your TypePad People list

Birthday

Gadzooks! It's time to post again. Today was my birthday. It's amazing how fast things are changing, especially with social media. Today I got birthday congratulation from people on Facebook, Twitter and Orkut. I don't remember how it went last year, but I'm pretty sure the most I got was was couple of tweets on Twitter. I'm looking forward to seeing where birthday wishes come from on my next birthday.

November 03, 2008 at 10:16 PM in Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (1)

Great Mysteries #1

For a long time I've been planning on writing an entry listing the top ten theoretically answerable questions of my life. The problem is I can never seem to remember all ten at one sitting, so I'll just have to do one per day. Today's question:

What's up with the www?

Yes, I know that it stands for world wide web, but what is it's function in web addresses? Going to www.tvindy.com will take me to the same place as tvindy.com. But tvindy.typepad.com is not the same as www.tvindy.typepad.com, at least not until recently. (In the past, adding the www created a dead link, but now I see that is no longer the case.) A much better example is stylewizard.com vs. www.stylewizard.com. Both addresses are valid but lead to completely unrelated sites, causing great confusion among college students who are trying to access the bibliographic aid but leave out the www. What gives? How can the same domain (stylewizard.com) be simultaneously owned by two separate entities? Just what is the function of www, and what does it do? I personally own a few domains. Does this mean that someone can just swoop in and buy up variants that are identical in every way except for the presence of the www?

April 18, 2006 at 12:51 PM in Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)

Protopage & Writely

Everyone knows the future is in online apps. Yesterday I was listening to the This Week in Tech podcast in which Leo and Amber interviewed the creator of a free service called Protopage. According to them it's the most effective implementation of Ajax so far. I've been using My Yahoo! as a portal since 1999, because nothing else was ever as good. But I think Protopage may have it beat. It's certainly easier to change around and is much more flexible. I could even see using it as a blogging service. If you go here, you can see the personal portal I whipped up for myself.

Also of note is Writely which is a powerful online word-processing program. I haven't had a chance to play with it yet, but it looks as though it lets you store and organize documents online, collaborate with other users, and publish to your blog.

I was also excited to read this. Then I realized that the author had made the whole thing up.

December 23, 2005 at 04:28 PM in Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (6) | TrackBack (0)

Blockbuster vs. Netflix

This is a followup to an entry I posted back in January showing my Netflix rental history. Since then, I signed up for a free trial from Blockbuster, allowing me temporarily to nearly double my rental volume. I was able to extend the two-week trial into four using a secret password. Then I found out about this deal, which allowed me to bring my total up to eight weeks. Yesterday was my last free day, so I cancelled, only to discover that I had been charged for the "free" extra month! (Oh well, at least I no longer feel guilty for taking advantage of the company.)

I enjoyed all the extra DVDs. Things will be hard for me now that my rental rate has suddenly been halved to three out at a time. (In reality, it's only two out, since I've still got that DVD out on the ledge.) But with finals coming up, I guess I'm probably better off.

So which is better? Well, I have to say up front, that I started with a strong bias toward Netflix. I've been a fairly happy customer for a year and a half and am also a stockholder. Still, I think I am being fairly objective in saying that Netflix was the clear winner. Despite the rampant claims of throttling, Netflix has been consistently at least twice as fast in turnaround as Blockbuster. (Partly this is due to their nearby shipping center in Salem.) Also, although I was initially impressed with the seemingly more secure Blockbuster envelopes, at least two of them arrived completely open, meaning the disc could easily have fallen out in transit. On the plus side, all the movies listed as "long wait" on my Netflix queue were available from Blockbuster. The in-store coupons were not useful for me, since I often go months without leaving campus. Netflix fits my needs far better than Blockbuster.

Having terminated my Blockbuster account, I think now would be a good time to repost my full rental histories from both Netflix and Blockbuster. If you wish to take a gander, click the link below (and please excuse the horrendous formatting):

Continue reading "Blockbuster vs. Netflix" »

May 23, 2005 at 09:03 AM in Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)

More DVDs Than you Can Shake a Stick at

5dvds

Yesterday I received 5 DVDs in the mail. That's because, in addition to my Netflix membership, I recently signed up for a free trial with Blockbuster. Normally that would only last two weeks, but I learned of a secret password here that extends this period to four weeks.

Besides the extra DVDs, the great thing about the Blockbuster trial is that it gives me an opportunity to finally rent the movies that Netflix has labeled "long wait" on my queue, meaning that it may be weeks before they let me have them. Blockbuster, for the most part, lets me get these same movies right away. (Netflix would too if I were a new customer.)

Another advantage is that I get to compare the two services. The first thing that impressed me about Blockbuster were the envelopes, which are more secure than Netflix's. About a third of the disks I get from Netflix are torn at the edge in a very suspicious manner. There is always just enough of an opening so that a postal worker could separate the paper and look in to see the title. I became convinced that this was actual tampering when I received an envelope with a much longer-than-usual tear. I noticed that the disk inside was upside down, meaning that the tear had to be extended to see the title. So far, I've never had a disk become lost in the mail, but it's probably just a matter of time. The Blockbuster envelopes make tampering a bit more difficult.

Where Blockbuster lost a lot of points with me was on my rental of the Battlestar Galactica miniseries. Unlike Netflix, Blockbuster lists it as spanning two DVDs. The first has the original run of four episodes on one side with special features on the other. The second disk, which counts as an additional rental on the three-out plan, has those same special features and nothing else. In other words, it's completely redundant! True, this isn't a huge tragedy for me. I've still got more DVDs out now than I know what to do with. But Netflix has never done anything quite that stupid to me.

I wonder what else awaits me on this epic four-week adventure.

March 26, 2005 at 06:23 AM in Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (1)

Netflix

Lately it seems that everyone (Snowball, Receptionista, Julijul and especially Mike) has been blogging about Netflix. I've been a member continuously since October of 2003, and I'm even a stockholder. I thought it would be interesting to retrace my rental history, so you can see what I've been watching in this period. Here we go:

  1. Angel season 1 & 2 (12 disks)
  2. Star Trek: Deep Space Nine seasons 1-7 (46 disks)
  3. V (3 disks)
  4. Red Dwarf series 1-4 & bonus material (5 disks)
  5. Jeremiah season 1 (6 disks)
  6. Freaks & Geeks (6 disks)
  7. Firefly (4 disks)
  8. The Real World: New York (2 disks)
  9. Roger & Me
  10. Michael Moore's The Awful Truth seasons 1-2 (4 disks)
  11. Timeline
  12. The Luzhin Defence
  13. Frequency
  14. Kill Bill: Vol. 1
  15. Kill Bill: Vol. 2
  16. Dallas seasons 1-2 (10 disks)
  17. Bowling for Columbine
  18. Survivor season 1 & bonus disk (6 disks)
  19. Ed Sullivan: Muppets Magic
  20. X2: X-Men United
  21. X-Men Evolution season 1 (4 disks)
  22. Life is Beautiful
  23. Returner
  24. MARS Dead or Alive: Nova
  25. Pippi Longstocking: TV Series
  26. Super Size Me
  27. 13 Going on 30
  28. Donnie Darko
  29. Voices of Iraq
  30. Spellbound
  31. Trekkies

If I count right, that comes to 127 DVDs rented thus far.

January 13, 2005 at 05:59 AM in Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (10) | TrackBack (0)

Gmail Invites

If anyone out there needs a Gmail account, I've still got five invitations. Just let me know.

(Sorry to keep writing such short posts. It's just that I'm so busy lately.)

September 20, 2004 at 08:03 PM in Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)

Emode

I took the IQ test on Emode and was told that I have an IQ of 136. Here's what else I was told:
Like a meticulous collector, you've fed your brain a unique set of facts and figures over the years. Words, numbers, you've got it all. That's what makes you a Facts Curator.

Whether or not you intend to absorb every piece of information that comes your way, your mind has certain steel-trap qualities to it. You are a knowledge sponge. You have almost enough words in your head to fill a dictionary, and you're equally adept when it comes to manipulating numbers. You can also detect important patterns in number sequences, and probably remember the mnemonic devices you were taught in grade school.

You may feel comfortable in classroom settings where absorbing details is critical. You're also able to learn from example and piece together all the little facts in life to get to the big picture. That's why you never stop accumulating information as you walk through life.

Your strengths lie in both the verbal and math realms — placing you in the same arena as someone like Bill Gates. Gates has the ability to not only store and retrieve an especially large amount of specialized data, but to translate and present that information to the population at large. His entire empire is based on this unique talent. And to think — your brain works in this same way! When it comes right down to it, you and other Facts Curators can ride a wave of information to live a truly enriched life.

I'm not quite sure what to make of these results. On the one hand it's nice to be told I have a high IQ, but I'm not sure I like being compared to Bill Gates. Couldn't they have said I have the IQ of Gandhi? Now that would be an IQ to be proud of. I guess this must all be accurate since the certificate says "PhD Certified", and anyone with a PhD is infallible. It's interesting that they never say who has the PhD or what her area is.

To explore further, I took another Emode quiz to determine my ideal job, and then they told me I had to pay money for them to give me an answer. Apparently I should become an architect and, under no circumstances, become an underwriter (not that I even know what that is). Being an architect might be fun, but there are clearly many other jobs for which I am much more ideally suited.

Okay, let's try just one more test. How about the Santa's Little Helper Test which is supposed to tell me what presents I should ask for this Christmas. And the answer is . . . electronics??? I could have told you that. What a useless test!

Based on the results of the last couple of tests, I feel reasonably assured that I am probably nothing like Bill Gates, and my true IQ is probably more like 70 (assuming that there is any validity to IQ scores). So now I suppose I should give up on Emode entirely -- but only after I take the What's Your Cat's Type? quiz.

December 13, 2003 at 02:59 AM in Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (9) | TrackBack (0)

Weekly Links

Updates to Previous Posts

Update to Infinity: mg directed me to this entry, which by sheer coincidence was published nine days after mine. It is in every way better and more comprehensive than what I wrote. The author really should go into writing textbooks.

Update to The Next Great Collectible: No More AOL CDs is dedicated to collecting a total of one million AOL CDs and returning them in one huge load to AOL. So far they have a quarter million. What this means is that a huge number of such CDs will soon be out of circulation, greatly increasing the value of those that remain. Furthermore, AOL may feel pressured to stop sending out unsolicited CDs, which will also make them scarcer. Start stockpiling your AOL CDs now, so that in twenty years you can sell them off to collectors for one million dollars!

Links

My site is still coming up on Froogle searches. (No wonder Froogle is still in beta.)

I never thought there could ever be a Barbie more disturbing than Oreo Barbie. I was wrong. (from Eat Your Vegetables)

It's because of issues like this that people in other countries think Americans are weird. (from kill as few patients as possible)

And it's because of issues like this that Americans sometimes think Canadians are weird. (from stupidangrycanajun)

Spammer in the Slammer! It's about time. (from Fark)

Go here for all your voodoo needs. (from snowball)

Look, it's a clock of blocks!. (from Zannah)

Remember back when both Marvel and DC Comics featured full-page ads of their respective superheroes defeating evil villains with nothing more than Hostess fruit pies. These ads have now been archived online for posterity.

December 12, 2003 at 02:59 AM in Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Weekly Links

This Christmas be sure to watch out for STIs. Warning, this is gross! (from snowball)

There is no end to the things you can do with a broken cat. Don't you just love modern technology?

Speaking of technology, it's because of ideas like this that the US is able to maintain itself as the top military power in the world. (from Zannah)

Remember Sea Monkeys? They're still around.

The RIAA is still at it.

Blogshares has closed down. This is terrible! I worked very hard to amass hundreds of thousands of fake dollars, and now they are gone! Perhaps I should sue?

And if none of the above links interest you, you can always go to zefrank.com. That stuff is always great.

December 05, 2003 at 02:59 AM in Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)

Next »

Primary Readers

  • Mulubinba Moments
  • bill stevenson dot org
  • Snowball in Hell
  • Bakerina
  • Youngest of One
  • Following Edge
  • Reality Sandwich

Intermittent Readers

  • TwilightCafé
  • Figs and Pomegranates
  • Centime
  • Music and Cats
  • Teka
  • Snozzle5
  • 'mouse

Good stuff

  • Jumping Monkeys
  • #!/usr/bin/girl
  • Amberbamberboo
  • Leo Laporte
  • Contrary Brin
  • Paul Graham

Recent Comments

  • girish on Cultural Jeopardy
  • Apeman on Are Humans Apes?
  • tvindy on Ancient TV Pics
  • hi on Ancient TV Pics
  • flowmaster mufflers on Ancient Comments
  • Amy on Are Humans Apes?
  • Amy on Are Humans Apes?
  • Switchblademan on Barbie Girl (foreign)
  • s on Are Humans Apes?
  • Thomas on Brazilian Soap Operas

Recently Updated Weblogs

  • Rebeccaboville's blog
  • Jonah Manning's blog
  • seruu's blog
  • seruu's blog
  • sports uncensored 24/7
  • seruu's blog
  • Elizabeth Riggin's blog
  • Spencer Lee
  • habashy's blog
  • Our Ordinary Days